NeoVoc/language/bg: Difference between revisions

* If the imported equivalent is fine, remove the warning (click "edit" next to the equivalent in Bulgarian, send the "warning" qualifier to the trash, and save).

* If the imported equivalent is to be replaced, replace it by clicking "edit" next to the "equivalent" in Bulgarian, and correct the label. Also, send the Wikidata warning to the trash before saving.

* If, in addition to a drafted equivalent, you find a gloss (short description) in the upper "description" section, please review also that. If you regard it as inappropriate, please edit it; you can provide a gloss if there is nothing if you want (you are encouraged to do so, but the equivalents are more important than the glosses).

* From time to time, the label in the upper part of the entry ("labels" section) will be updated according to what you enter as "equivalent" in Bulgarian in the "statements" section. That means you don't have to edit the equivalent manually in both places; the "equivalent" in the "statements" section is the one we will use. The reason why we have to enter new equivalents in the “statements” section (instead of simply adding labels in the “labels” section) is that we want to make statements about these equivalents (for example, where we have found the equivalent).

For concept equivalents in Bulgarian where you have removed the warning, or where you have provided an equivalent in the "statements" section of the entity page, we will create a dictionary entry. The linguistic description of the term will go there.

* The meta-terminology used for this task might be unusual for terminologists and/or lexicographers; for obvious reasons, we tend to call things how they are called on a Wikibase. May this very short glossary be helpful:

** “concept entry”: On a Wikibase, an entity URI starting with “Q” describes an ontological concept (an entry in a concept-centered termbase), which is “labelled” with one preferred label and several “alternative” labels. Wikibase labels are not supposed to be terms, at least not on Wikidata; they are strings that users might want to enter in a search when trying to find the concept entry. That allows fuzzyness and redundancy. We enter our exact and validated terms (the multilingual equivalents that denote the concept we have in front of us) in the “statements” section, where we can further describe them.

** “lexeme entry”: On a Wikibase, lexical dictionary-like entries (lemma-centered entries that offer a linguistic description) are by default modelled according to Ontolex-Lemon. Their URI starts with an “L”. Each Lexeme entity has “Sense” and “Form” subentities; these are displayed on the same entity page (e.g. https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/wiki/Lexeme:L1). The “sense” section lists dictionary senses, the “forms” section lists (inflected) word forms together with a morphological description of the form (on Wikibase called “grammatical features”, like genitive, plural, etc.). Lexeme entries do not have labels, they have lemmata associated to language codes instead (they can have more than one, look at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L791). The further linguistic description of the lexeme consists in statements attached at the appropriate level (entry, sense, form). Most important for us is that dictionary senses will be linked to ontology items. This link in Ontolex is referred to as ontolex:reference, on Wikidata as http://www.wikidata.org/entity/P5137, and on our Wikibase as https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/entity/P12 (“concept for this sense”). This is what links lexical entries to concept entries; exploiting that link, data involving concept entries and lexical entries can be brought together.

=== Only those NeoVoc entries with equivalents in Bulgarian (without warnings) ===