Bots, emailconfirmed
8,882
edits
NeoVoc/language/he: Difference between revisions
From eneoli wikibase
recreate wiki page using upload_lang_page.py
(recreate wiki page using upload_lang_page.py) |
(recreate wiki page using upload_lang_page.py) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* If the imported equivalent is to be replaced, replace it by clicking "edit" next to the equivalent in Hebrew, and correct it. Also, send the Wikidata warning to the trash before saving. | * If the imported equivalent is to be replaced, replace it by clicking "edit" next to the equivalent in Hebrew, and correct it. Also, send the Wikidata warning to the trash before saving. | ||
* If, in addition to a drafted equivalent, you find a gloss (short description) in the upper "description" section, please review also that. If you regard it as inappropriate, please edit it; you can provide a gloss if there is nothing if you want (you are encouraged to do so, but the equivalents are more important than the glosses, and, for these glosses, we will not have "warnings" for the unvalidated). | * If, in addition to a drafted equivalent, you find a gloss (short description) in the upper "description" section, please review also that. If you regard it as inappropriate, please edit it; you can provide a gloss if there is nothing if you want (you are encouraged to do so, but the equivalents are more important than the glosses, and, for these glosses, we will not have "warnings" for the unvalidated). | ||
* From time to time, the label in the upper part of the entry ("labels" section) will be updated according to what you enter as "equivalent" in Hebrew in the "statements" section. That means you don't have to edit the equivalent manually in both places; the "equivalent" in the "statements" section is the one we will use. The reason why we have to enter new equivalents in the “statements” section (instead of simply adding labels in the “labels” section) is that we want to make statements about these equivalents (for example, that there is no "warning" stating that it is still unvalidated, or where we have found the equivalent). | * From time to time, the label in the upper part of the entry ("labels" section) will be updated according to what you enter as "equivalent" in Hebrew in the "statements" section. That means you don't have to edit the equivalent manually in both places; the "equivalent" in the "statements" section is the one we will use for the creation of a lexical entry). The reason why we have to enter new equivalents in the “statements” section (instead of simply adding labels in the “labels” section) is that we want to make statements about these equivalents (for example, that there is no "warning" stating that it is still unvalidated, or where we have found the equivalent). | ||
The second goal will be to provide missing equivalents in Hebrew. For this, use the first query on this page ("all concepts"). The first lines are those that are still not defined. To define an equivalent, enter the entry page by clicking on the ID in the first column, and click on "add value" in the “statements" section, where values for the “equivalents" property are listed (e.g., for example at https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/wiki/Item:Q1083#P57) . | The second goal will be to provide missing equivalents in Hebrew. For this, use the first query on this page ("all concepts"). The first lines are those that are still not defined. To define an equivalent, enter the entry page by clicking on the ID in the first column, and click on "add value" in the “statements" section, where values for the “equivalents" property are listed (e.g., for example at https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/wiki/Item:Q1083#P57) . | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
For concept equivalents in Hebrew where you have removed the warning, or where you have provided an equivalent in the "statements" section of the entity page without adding any warning (you may add warning text like "not sure", or whatever you like), we will automatically create a dictionary entry. The linguistic description of the term will go there. | For concept equivalents in Hebrew where you have removed the warning, or where you have provided an equivalent in the "statements" section of the entity page without adding any warning (you may add warning text like "not sure", or whatever you like), we will automatically create a dictionary entry. The linguistic description of the term will go there. | ||
* We will soon decide on the type of information to be collected in each term's dictionary entry. | * We will soon decide on the type of information to be collected in each term's dictionary entry. | ||
<<<<<<< Updated upstream | |||
* The meta-terminology used for this task might be unusual for terminologists and/or lexicographers; for obvious reasons, we tend to call things how they are called on a Wikibase, but try to adapt that terminology for the work in ENEOLI as follows in this very short glossary, which may be helpful: | |||
** “concept entry”: On a Wikibase, an entity ID starting with “Q” describes an ontological concept (an entry in a concept-centered termbase), which is “labelled” with one preferred label and several “alternative” labels. Wikibase labels are not supposed to be terms, at least not on Wikidata; they are strings that users might want to enter in a search when trying to find the concept entry. That allows fuzzyness and redundancy. We enter our exact and validated terms (the multilingual equivalents that denote the concept we have in front of us) in the “statements” section, where we can further describe them. | |||
** “lexeme entry”: On a Wikibase, lexical dictionary-like entries (lemma-centered entries that offer a linguistic description) are by default modelled according to Ontolex-Lemon. Their ID starts with an “L”. Each Lexeme entity has “Sense” and “Form” subentities; these are displayed on the same entity page (e.g. https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/wiki/Lexeme:L1). The “sense” section lists dictionary senses, the “forms” section lists (inflected) word forms together with a morphological description of the form (on Wikibase called “grammatical features”, like genitive, plural, etc.). Lexeme entries do not have labels, they have lemmata associated to language codes instead (they can have more than one, look at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L791). The further linguistic description of the lexeme consists in statements attached at the appropriate level (entry, sense, form). Most important for us is that dictionary senses will be linked to concept entries. This link in Ontolex is referred to as ontolex:reference, on Wikidata as http://www.wikidata.org/entity/P5137, and on our Wikibase as https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/entity/P12 (“concept for this sense”). This is what links lexical entries to concept entries; exploiting that link, data involving concept entries and lexical entries can be brought together. | |||
======= | |||
=== Meta-terminology === | === Meta-terminology === | ||
The meta-terminology used for this task might be unusual for terminologists and/or lexicographers; for obvious reasons, we tend to call things how they are called on a Wikibase. May this very short glossary be helpful: | The meta-terminology used for this task might be unusual for terminologists and/or lexicographers; for obvious reasons, we tend to call things how they are called on a Wikibase. May this very short glossary be helpful: | ||
* “concept entry”: On a Wikibase, an entity | * “concept entry”: On a Wikibase, an entity ID starting with “Q” describes an ontological concept (an entry in a concept-centered termbase where concepts can have terminological relations to each other), which is “labelled” with one preferred label and several “alternative” labels. Wikibase labels are not supposed to be terms, at least not on Wikidata; they are strings that users might want to enter in a search when trying to find the concept entry. That allows fuzzyness and redundancy. We enter our exact and validated terms (the multilingual equivalents that denote the concept we have in front of us) in the “statements” section, where we can further describe them. | ||
* “lexeme entry”: On a Wikibase, lexical dictionary-like entries (lemma-centered entries that offer a | * “lexeme entry”: On a Wikibase, lexical dictionary-like entries (lemma-centered entries that offer a lexicographic description) are by default modelled according to Ontolex-Lemon. Their ID starts with an “L”. Each Lexeme entity has “Sense” and “Form” subentities; these are displayed on the same entity page (e.g. https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/wiki/Lexeme:L1). The “sense” section lists dictionary senses, the “forms” section lists (inflected) word forms together with a morphological description of the form (on Wikibase called “grammatical features”, like genitive, plural, etc.). Lexeme entries do not have labels, they have lemmata associated to language codes instead (they can have more than one, look at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Lexeme:L791). The further linguistic description of the lexeme consists in statements attached at the appropriate level (entry, sense, form). Most important for us is that dictionary senses will be linked to concept entries. That link or "property" in Ontolex is referred to as ontolex:reference, on Wikidata as http://www.wikidata.org/entity/P5137, and on our Wikibase as https://eneoli.wikibase.cloud/entity/P12 (“concept for this sense”). This is what links lexical entries to concept entries; exploiting that link, data involving concept entries and lexical entries can be brought together. Lemmata of lexical entries are the strings to find in the NeoCorpus articles (if a lemma is found in lemmatized text, the article metadata gets enriched with that information - that is our plan. We will thus be able to ask in what articles a term occurs, and do that multilingually, exploting links to commonly denoted concepts). | ||
* A "term" in our database will appear twice: (1) as equivalent to a concept, in the "statements" section of a concept entry, and (2) as lemma to a lexical entry. Equivalents with no warning attached to it are validated terms. For these, lexical entries will be created automatically as soon as the task leaders run the maintanance script; the equivalent statement and the lexical entry sense will be linked to each other. You have to make sure that concept equivalents without a warning attached are indeed validated. | * A "term" in our database will appear twice: (1) as equivalent to a concept, in the "statements" section of a concept entry, and (2) as lemma to a lexical entry. Equivalents with no warning attached to it are validated terms. For these, lexical entries will be created automatically as soon as the task leaders run the maintanance script; the equivalent statement and the lexical entry sense will be linked to each other. You have to make sure that concept equivalents without a warning attached are indeed validated. | ||
* A "warning" is a [[Property:P58|P58]] qualifier to an equivalent statement. For adding a warning to an equivalent, click on "edit" next to the equivalent, and add a qualifier, typing "warning" or "P58" in the qualifier property field, and entering any value in the qualifier value field, then click "save". | * A "warning" is a [[Property:P58|P58]] qualifier to an equivalent statement. For adding a warning to an equivalent, click on "edit" next to the equivalent, and add a qualifier, typing "warning" or "P58" in the qualifier property field, and entering any value in the qualifier value field, then click "save". | ||
* "Wikibase" is a software platform, and we are running our own instance of it, this one, ENEOLI Wikibase. "Wikidata" is another Wikibase instance, available at https://www.wikidata.org. | * "Wikibase" is a software platform, and we are running our own instance of it, this one, ENEOLI Wikibase. "Wikidata" is another Wikibase instance, available at https://www.wikidata.org. | ||
>>>>>>> Stashed changes | |||
== See the content of NeoVoc for Hebrew == | == See the content of NeoVoc for Hebrew == | ||
=== All NeoVoc concept entries === | === All NeoVoc concept entries === | ||
